|
Climate models predict
significant changes to the Earth's climate in the coming century. But
there is a huge range in what they predict - how should we deal with this
uncertainty? If they are over-estimating the speed and scale of climate
change, we may end up panicking unnecessarily and investing huge amounts
of money trying to avert a problem which doesn't turn out to be as serious
as the models suggested. Alternatively, if the models are under-estimating
the change, we will end up doing too little, too late in the mistaken
belief that the changes will be manageably small and gradual.
To cope with this problem we need to evaluate our confidence in the
predictions from climate models. In other words we need to quantify the
uncertainty in these predictions. By participating in the experiment,
you can help us to do this in a way that would not otherwise be possible.
Even with the incredible speed of today's supercomputers, climate models
have to include the effects of small-scale physical processes (such as
clouds) through simplifications (parameterizations).
There is a range of uncertainty in the precise values of many of the parameters
used - we do not know precisely what value is most realistic. Sometimes
this range can be an order of magnitude! This means that any single forecast
represents only one of many possible ways the climate could develop.
How can we assess and reduce this uncertainty?
There are two complementary approaches to this problem:
- Improve the parameterizations while narrowing the range of uncertainty
in the parameters. This is a continuous process and requires:
- Improving the models, using the latest supercomputers as they become
available.
- Gathering more and more (mainly satellite) data on a wide range
of atmospheric variables (such as wind speed, cloud cover, temperature.....).
- Carry out large numbers of model runs in which the parameters are
varied within their current range of uncertainty. Reject those which
fail to model past climate successfully and use the remainder to study
future climate.
The second scenario is the climateprediction.net
approach. Our intention is to run hundreds of thousands of state-of-the-art
climate models with slightly different physics in order to represent the
whole range of uncertainties in all the parameterizations. This technique,
known as ensemble forecasting, requires an enormous amount of computing
power, far beyond the currently available resources of cutting-edge supercomputers.
The only practical solution is to appeal to distributed computing which
combines the power of thousands of ordinary computers, each computer tackling
one small but key part of the global problem.
|